Accused murderer and ex-cop Drew Peterson baffles the prosecution with a very strange motion.
The notorious Peterson, a former Bolingbrook, Ill. police officer, is being held on a $20 million bond while awaiting trial for the March 2004 murder of his third wife, Kathleen Savio.
Peterson is also still the sole suspect in the October 2007 disappearance of his fourth wife, Stacy Peterson and state police consider Stacy Peterson to be the victim of a "potential homicide," but have yet to make an arrest in the case.
"We’re not certain what he’s getting at with that motion," Charles B. Pelkie, the spokesman for the state’s attorney’s office told media.
Pelkie explained prosecutors were still reviewing Peterson’s defense lawyers Joel Brodsky and Andrew Abood’s filing of "objection to profer (sic) of expert witnesses" .
The motion then lists five questions the court must ask before admitting expert testimony in the murder case.
Peterson’s motion then "requests that this Court compel the People to ring the bell and answer in the People’s favor" .
"We’re not certain what he means by ‘ring the bell,’" Pelkie revealed.
"We’re not certain what he means by that."
Neither are we.
